Nationwide preliminary injunction and stay on implementation of the 2020 final USCIS fee rule in its entirety

USCIS fee increase 2020 is now on hold 9/29/20

Summary: New fees and form versions and other changes associated with the final fee rule that were to be effective on October 2, 2020 are now on hold.

Back in July, I shared this article USCIS fee increase; 2020 OPT fee increase by 34% which highlighted the USCIS fee increase 2020 that would impact F and J students. The rule specified that “Any application, petition, or request postmarked on or after this date (10/2/2020) must be accompanied with the fees established by this final rule.” Based on this final rule, OPT applicants were supposed to pay $550 as a filing fee starting from October 2nd. In addition, Form I-765 supposed to be updated to reflect this change, which requires students to complete the 10/2/2020 edition of Form I-765.

However, on September 29, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction and stay on implementation of the 2020 final USCIS fee rule. Therefore, if you were planning to apply for OPT in the near future, you can continue to complete the 8/25/2020 edition of the Form I-765 and pay $410 even after October 2nd until the court issues the final decision. If you haven’t taken a look at increased fees, you can click the Related blog post 1 below. I also added a table that shows the summary of the fee change in the next section. To learn how to check the edition of the form, you can click the Related blog post 2.

This is the summary of the recent court rule and in the next section, I will briefly discuss why Chad Wolf (Acting Secretary of Department of Homeland Security) was accused twice in 3 months.

Related blog post 1: USCIS fee increase; 2020 OPT fee increase by 34%
Related blog post 2: IMPORTANT I-765 form update: 8/25/2020 edition

Immigration Benefit RequestCurrent feeOnline filing final feePaper filing final fee
I-765 Application for Employment Authorization (Non-DACA)$410N/A$550
I-765 Application for Employment Authorization (DACA only)$410N/A$410
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card$455$405$415
I-130 Petition for Alien Relative$535$550$560
I-539 Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status$370$390$400
N-400 Application for Naturalization$640$1,160$1,170
N-565 Application for Replacement Naturalization/Citizenship Document$555$535$545
N-600 Application for Certificate of Citizenship$1,170$900$1,000
N-600K Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate$1,170$935$945
Table 1: Non-Statutory IEFA Immigration Benefit Request Fees

Contents


Why Plaintiffs accused Defendants

According to the document Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction, there are three main reasons that Plaintiffs (Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al.) accused Defendants (Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security).

  1. Failing to Disclose Data, Relying on Unexplained Data, and Ignoring Data in the Record.
    • For the Plaintiffs, it is not clear why the fee increase is inevitable.
  2. Failure to Consider Important Aspects of the Problem.
    • DHS was planning to require a $50.00 non-waivable fee to apply for asylum. Plaintiffs argue that until this rule was proposed, the United States did not charge a fee to apply for asylum. In this regard, the Plaintiffs are worried about the negative impact the rule will have on low-income immigrant populations.
  3. Failure to Justify Policy Shifts
    • Like it is mentioned above, charging asylum and so forth is shifting the policy from the ability-to-pay principle, which has been a primary principle for the U.S. policies, to the beneficiary-pays principle.

Due to these reasons, the Plaintiffs (Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al.) even questioned: “The Validity of Mr. McAleenan’s and Mr. Wolf’s Service as Acting Secretary of DHS” (page 6). If you have followed the blog, you might have noticed that this is his second time being accused in the past 3 months. When ICE prohibited the entry of international students who are taking 100% online classes, he got sued by Harvard and MIT along with other 50+ higher education institutions. Details on this matter can be found in the following two related blog posts.

Related blog post 1: Harvard, MIT, California State filed Lawsuits against ICE rules
Related blog post 2: ICE rule on international students is rescinded


What the court ordered on the USCIS fee increase 2020

The court ordered:

  1. “Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. section 705 the Court STAYS implementation and the effective date of USCIS Immigration Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements, 85 Fed. Reg. 46,788 (Aug. 3, 2020) (the “Final Rule”) in its entirety pending final adjudication of this matter.
  2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, Defendants Wolf, in his official capacity under the title of Acting Secretary of DHS; Cuccinelli, in his official capacity under the title of Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of DHS; DHS; and USCIS, and all persons acting under their direction, ARE ENJOINED from implementing or enforcing the Final Rule or any portion thereof.
  3. This preliminary injunction and stay shall take effect immediately and shall remain in effect pending trial in this action or further of this Court.”

To reiterate, students who are graduating this December, thus plan to apply for OPT, can complete the 8/25/20 edition of the Form I-765 and pay $410 as a filing fee instead of 10/2/2020 edition and $550.

Be Savvies

Related Posts

J-1 exchange students? Apply for Academic Training for internships
J-1 签证

作为 J-1 交换生赴美实习?学术培训了解一下

交换生是指短期来美国学习和体验不同文化的学生。与获得学位(例如学士学位、硕士学位或博士学位)的攻读学位的学生不同,交换生不会从美国院校获得学位,而是从其本国大学获得学位。在签证方面,攻读学位的学生通常获得F-1学生签证,而非攻读学位(交换)的学生则获得J-1学生签证。但交换生有可能获得 F-1 签证。我为什么要谈论签证?这是因为 F-1 和 J-1 签证持有者都必须知道,根据移民法规,未经授权,他们不得在校外工作。因此,为了在校外公司实习,您应该根据您的签证类型申请不同的就业授权计划。例如,F-1学生应申请并获得批准用于在校期间实习的CPT和毕业后在校外工作的Post-completion OPT。对于 J-1 学生,有一个名为学术培训的项目,通过学术培训项目,交换生可以在校外工作。然而,学术培训规则不如 F-1 学生项目明确,因此大多数 J-1 交换生不会利用该项目。因此,如果您想充分利用在美国的留学经历,请仔细阅读本文,看看您是否符合资格。通过阅读本文,您将能够了解以下内容: (1) Purpose. The primary purpose of academic training is to permit a student, other than a student intern described in paragraph (i) of this section, to participate in an academic training program during his or her studies, without

Read More »
Academic disqualification
F-1 签证

取消学术资格、停学、留校察看和签证

大多数美国学院和大学都有适用于包括国际学生在内的所有学生的学术要求。例如,如果学生 GPA 成绩低于 2.0(满分 4.0),则根据下一学期的机构政策,他或她可能会被留校察看 (AP)。 AP 学生会被分配 AP 顾问,帮助他们提高 GPA。 如果学生的 GPA 没有提高或者学生没有成功完成 AP 流程,学生可能会被取消学业资格或收到学业停课通知。除非学生是故意不学习,否则没有学生愿意收到取消学业资格、停学、留校察看的通知,因为这意味着低 GPA 和没有奖学金等。 然而,对于国际学生来说,处于学术留校察看或被取消学术资格尤其是一件大事,因为他们的非移民身份(学生签证)可能会受到影响。由于国际学生留在美国的目的是学习,因此当他们因学术取消资格/停学和留校察看而无法注册课程时,他们可能不得不离开美国。 因此,这篇文章将探讨学术取消资格、停学和留校察看对国际学生签证状态的影响。经常被问到的问题,例如“美国领事官员会知道我被取消资格吗?”、“我应该怎么做才能取消留学查看的处分?” “我需要离开美国吗?”或“我怎样才能留在美国?”也将被讨论。 目录 留校察看 正如我上面简要提到的,通常会对学生进行学术留校察看,以避免学生离被取消学术资格而被停学更近了。从这个意义上说,大多数学生将能够在即将到来的入学中继续全日制入学。只要国际学生能够注册下一学期的全日制课程,此时学生签证或 SEVIS 记录(I-20 表)就不会受到影响。 话虽这么说,AP 学生应该尽力在下学期摆脱 AP 身份,以免被学校停学或失去身份。同样,处于 AP 状态的学生可能需要更多时间来满足毕业要求,这可能导致无法在 I-20 表格上注明的课程结束日期按时毕业。 在这种情况下,学生没有资格申请延期,因此他们必须返回自己的祖国完成课程。要了解有关“身份失效”的结果的更多信息,请单击以下相关文章: 相关文章:国际学生注意不要“身份失效” 如果你的学校阻止 AP 学生注册全日制课程,你应该与你所在大学的 DSO 沟通,看看你应该做什么,因为从技术上讲,除非你有资格获得减少课程量,否则你将失去身份。 我们鼓励想了解一些学习和写作技巧的国际学生查看以下文章: 相关文章1:全A学习指南:国际学生赴美留学相关文章2:抄袭?所有国际学生都应该知道的写作服务 停学/取消学术资格 现在让我们看一下与学业暂停或取消资格相关的移民法规。 一些院校为学术不合格并因此收到停课通知的学生提供上诉的机会。因此,如果您在学术上被取消资格,在做出最终决定之前,请务必检查您的学院或大学是否允许不合格的学生提出上诉。 如果您的学院或大学不为不合格的学生提供上诉机会,或者您的上诉被拒绝,那么您的签证身份就失效了,因为您不再是 I-20 签发的学院/大学的学生。

Read More »