lawsuit

Harvard, MIT, UC filed Lawsuits against ICE rules

More and more U.S. colleges and universities are announcing their plans to file lawsuits or to join other institutions to file federal lawsuits against the ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Harvard and MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) took the very first action filing the lawsuit on Wednesday, July 8th followed by the California State University system and the state’s community colleges’ lawsuit on the next day. The lawsuit against the Trump administration’s temporary exemptions- banning the entry to and remaining in the United States of F visa students who take fully online classes – by the California State is the first state-initiated lawsuit on SEVP’s recent updates. It also marks University of California (UC)’s second lawsuit against DHS (Department of Homeland Security) while it is California’s the 86th lawsuit against President Donald Trump. In this blog post, what are the reasons that two best colleges and one of the largest state university systems filed lawsuits aㅇgainst ICE rules and what they asked for will be discussed along with some quotes from Presidents and American universities’ Instagram posts regarding the recent SEVP policy.

Related blog post 1: 100% online school students can’t enter the U.S. for Fall 2020
Related blog post 2: SEVP updates on online classes and F students FAQ

Contents


Closer look at the Harvard, MIT and UC’s lawsuits against ICE rules

The California State University System had announced their plans in May to continue to offer remote learning for Fall 2020. Similarly, Harvard and MIT were planning to open the campus for the incoming semester, but only for a small subset of an entire student body. The fact that they have planned their Fall academic plans in advance is one of the reasons that they sued the four defendants:

  1. United States Department of Homeland Security
  2. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a division of the United States Department of Homeland Security
  3. Chad F. Wolf, who is the Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security
  4. Matthew Albence, who is the Acting Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Harvard and MIT also highlighted how important it is to ensure public safety in the face of COVID-19 pandemic and how ICE fails to recognize its seriousness on the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Boston. University of California also urged “that ICE failed to follow the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to consider both the University’s and students’ reliance interests when it barred international students from attending universities that only offer online courses during the ongoing health crisis.” In the same light, Harvard and MIT asked the following:

  1. A temporary restraining order and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief preventing Defendants from enforcing the policy announced in ICE’s July 6 Directive, or promulgating it as a Final Rule;
  2. An order vacating and setting aside the policy announced in the July 6 Directive and reinstating the March 13 Guidance;
  3. A declaration that the policy announced in the July 6 Directive is unlawful; 
  4. An order awarding Plaintiffs their costs and attorney’s fees; and
  5. Any and all other such relief as the Court may deem appropriate. 
Havard-MIT Complaint for Declaratory and Injuctive Relief

Quotes about the ICE’s SEVP updates

The announcement disrupts our international students’ lives and jeopardizes their academic and research pursuits. ICE is unable to offer the most basic answers about how its policy will be interpreted or implemented. And the guidance comes after many US colleges and universities either released or are readying their final decisions for the fall – decisions designed to advance their educational mission and protect the health and safety of their communities.
Our international students now have many questions – about their visas, their health, their families and their ability to continue working toward an MIT degree. Unspoken, but unmistakable, is one more question: Am I welcome?
At MIT, the answer, unequivocally, is yes.

MIT President L. Rafael Reif from MIT action in response to new ICE rule on online learning

“It is illegal, unnecessary and callous,” “UC will fight this blatant disregard for the law and public health with all the legal means at our disposal.”

University of California President Janet Napolitano in UC poised to sue federal government over new visa policy for international students

“Immediately after the Fourth of July weekend, ICE threw Harvard and MIT— indeed, virtually all of higher education in the United States—into chaos,” (ICE’s action) “leaves hundreds of thousands of international students with no educational options within the United States

The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Boston from Harvard, MIT and Northeastern Sue Feds Over Rules Barring International Students

Instagram examples that shows universities’ commitment to take legal action

View this post on Instagram

Brown is joining with a number of peer colleges and universities in opposing a new federal policy that will prohibit international students from returning to or remaining in the United States if their colleges adopt online-only instruction for Fall 2020 or if students choose online-only instruction. The University will file an amicus brief in support of the legal action taken by @Harvard and @mitpics to seek a temporary restraining order to block the implementation of the new federal guidance on the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Calling the policy “nothing short of cruel” in a message to the campus community, President Christina H. Paxson said it came “at a time when every student, regardless of their country of origin, should benefit from the maximum level of flexibility to pursue their studies in a manner that they or their institutions decide has the highest capacity to support their health and safety.” The brief is expected to be filed with the federal court on Monday, July 13. See link in bio for more information.

A post shared by Brown University (@brownu) on

View this post on Instagram

University of Minnesota President Gabel today: ““Our planned hybrid teaching model this fall supports both in-person and online courses, which should reduce the impact of ICE’s decision on our nearly 6,200 international students systemwide,” Gabel said. “However, we cannot stand by in good conscience as international students are forced out of the country through no fault of their own. Educational institutions across the country are offering expanded online learning opportunities to comply with the public health advice given by another federal agency—the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—to reduce large gatherings, promote physical distancing and take other precautions to minimize the spread and impact of COVID-19. “We stand with our international students, and international students across the country, in asking that the ICE directive be overturned immediately,” Gabel said.” #globalgophers #umnproud

A post shared by ISSS-University of Minnesota (@isssumn) on

View this post on Instagram

Boston University will support two lawsuits and congressional action to fight new federal immigration guidance requiring international students with F-1 visas to leave the US, or transfer to another school, if their university is offering only remote instruction in the fall. BU President Robert A. Brown has directed University officials to join an amicus brief being filed in support of a lawsuit brought by Harvard and MIT against the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy by filing an amicus brief in federal district court to enjoin the rules from going into effect. In addition, he has instructed BU lawyers to provide support and evidence to Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey as she files a lawsuit in US District Court next week to prevent ICE from enacting the new guidelines.   “The new policy is counterproductive, damaging to the progress of international students who fuel the strength of our national research universities, and xenophobic,” says Jean Morrison, BU provost and chief academic officer. “It should be reversed.” Click the link in our bio for more info.

A post shared by Boston University (@bostonu) on

Be Savvies

Related Posts

J-1 exchange students? Apply for Academic Training for internships
J-1 签证

作为 J-1 交换生赴美实习?学术培训了解一下

交换生是指短期来美国学习和体验不同文化的学生。与获得学位(例如学士学位、硕士学位或博士学位)的攻读学位的学生不同,交换生不会从美国院校获得学位,而是从其本国大学获得学位。在签证方面,攻读学位的学生通常获得F-1学生签证,而非攻读学位(交换)的学生则获得J-1学生签证。但交换生有可能获得 F-1 签证。我为什么要谈论签证?这是因为 F-1 和 J-1 签证持有者都必须知道,根据移民法规,未经授权,他们不得在校外工作。因此,为了在校外公司实习,您应该根据您的签证类型申请不同的就业授权计划。例如,F-1学生应申请并获得批准用于在校期间实习的CPT和毕业后在校外工作的Post-completion OPT。对于 J-1 学生,有一个名为学术培训的项目,通过学术培训项目,交换生可以在校外工作。然而,学术培训规则不如 F-1 学生项目明确,因此大多数 J-1 交换生不会利用该项目。因此,如果您想充分利用在美国的留学经历,请仔细阅读本文,看看您是否符合资格。通过阅读本文,您将能够了解以下内容: (1) Purpose. The primary purpose of academic training is to permit a student, other than a student intern described in paragraph (i) of this section, to participate in an academic training program during his or her studies, without

Read More »
Academic disqualification
F-1 签证

取消学术资格、停学、留校察看和签证

大多数美国学院和大学都有适用于包括国际学生在内的所有学生的学术要求。例如,如果学生 GPA 成绩低于 2.0(满分 4.0),则根据下一学期的机构政策,他或她可能会被留校察看 (AP)。 AP 学生会被分配 AP 顾问,帮助他们提高 GPA。 如果学生的 GPA 没有提高或者学生没有成功完成 AP 流程,学生可能会被取消学业资格或收到学业停课通知。除非学生是故意不学习,否则没有学生愿意收到取消学业资格、停学、留校察看的通知,因为这意味着低 GPA 和没有奖学金等。 然而,对于国际学生来说,处于学术留校察看或被取消学术资格尤其是一件大事,因为他们的非移民身份(学生签证)可能会受到影响。由于国际学生留在美国的目的是学习,因此当他们因学术取消资格/停学和留校察看而无法注册课程时,他们可能不得不离开美国。 因此,这篇文章将探讨学术取消资格、停学和留校察看对国际学生签证状态的影响。经常被问到的问题,例如“美国领事官员会知道我被取消资格吗?”、“我应该怎么做才能取消留学查看的处分?” “我需要离开美国吗?”或“我怎样才能留在美国?”也将被讨论。 目录 留校察看 正如我上面简要提到的,通常会对学生进行学术留校察看,以避免学生离被取消学术资格而被停学更近了。从这个意义上说,大多数学生将能够在即将到来的入学中继续全日制入学。只要国际学生能够注册下一学期的全日制课程,此时学生签证或 SEVIS 记录(I-20 表)就不会受到影响。 话虽这么说,AP 学生应该尽力在下学期摆脱 AP 身份,以免被学校停学或失去身份。同样,处于 AP 状态的学生可能需要更多时间来满足毕业要求,这可能导致无法在 I-20 表格上注明的课程结束日期按时毕业。 在这种情况下,学生没有资格申请延期,因此他们必须返回自己的祖国完成课程。要了解有关“身份失效”的结果的更多信息,请单击以下相关文章: 相关文章:国际学生注意不要“身份失效” 如果你的学校阻止 AP 学生注册全日制课程,你应该与你所在大学的 DSO 沟通,看看你应该做什么,因为从技术上讲,除非你有资格获得减少课程量,否则你将失去身份。 我们鼓励想了解一些学习和写作技巧的国际学生查看以下文章: 相关文章1:全A学习指南:国际学生赴美留学相关文章2:抄袭?所有国际学生都应该知道的写作服务 停学/取消学术资格 现在让我们看一下与学业暂停或取消资格相关的移民法规。 一些院校为学术不合格并因此收到停课通知的学生提供上诉的机会。因此,如果您在学术上被取消资格,在做出最终决定之前,请务必检查您的学院或大学是否允许不合格的学生提出上诉。 如果您的学院或大学不为不合格的学生提供上诉机会,或者您的上诉被拒绝,那么您的签证身份就失效了,因为您不再是 I-20 签发的学院/大学的学生。

Read More »
F-1 to O-1 visa pathway after OPT/STEM OPT
F-1 비자의 모든 것

F-1 유학생 비자에서 OPT/STEM OPT, O-1 비자 까지 잘 이어지려면?

O-1 비자는 다음 분야에서 “뛰어난 능력 extraordinary ability“을 보유한 (미국 입장)외국인이 미국에 체류하며 최대 3년까지 근무할 수 있도록 허용하며, 연장 횟수에 제한 없이 1년 단위로 연장이 가능합니다. 이 뿐 아니라, O-1B 비자는 예술가도 미국에 체류하며 근무할 수 있도록 허가해 주는 비자로, 예술 분야의 예시는 다음과 같습니다: 개인이 “뛰어난 능력 extraordinary

Read More »