lawsuit

Harvard, MIT, UC filed Lawsuits against ICE rules

More and more U.S. colleges and universities are announcing their plans to file lawsuits or to join other institutions to file federal lawsuits against the ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Harvard and MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) took the very first action filing the lawsuit on Wednesday, July 8th followed by the California State University system and the state’s community colleges’ lawsuit on the next day. The lawsuit against the Trump administration’s temporary exemptions- banning the entry to and remaining in the United States of F visa students who take fully online classes – by the California State is the first state-initiated lawsuit on SEVP’s recent updates. It also marks University of California (UC)’s second lawsuit against DHS (Department of Homeland Security) while it is California’s the 86th lawsuit against President Donald Trump. In this blog post, what are the reasons that two best colleges and one of the largest state university systems filed lawsuits aㅇgainst ICE rules and what they asked for will be discussed along with some quotes from Presidents and American universities’ Instagram posts regarding the recent SEVP policy.

Related blog post 1: 100% online school students can’t enter the U.S. for Fall 2020
Related blog post 2: SEVP updates on online classes and F students FAQ

Contents


Closer look at the Harvard, MIT and UC’s lawsuits against ICE rules

The California State University System had announced their plans in May to continue to offer remote learning for Fall 2020. Similarly, Harvard and MIT were planning to open the campus for the incoming semester, but only for a small subset of an entire student body. The fact that they have planned their Fall academic plans in advance is one of the reasons that they sued the four defendants:

  1. United States Department of Homeland Security
  2. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a division of the United States Department of Homeland Security
  3. Chad F. Wolf, who is the Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security
  4. Matthew Albence, who is the Acting Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Harvard and MIT also highlighted how important it is to ensure public safety in the face of COVID-19 pandemic and how ICE fails to recognize its seriousness on the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Boston. University of California also urged “that ICE failed to follow the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to consider both the University’s and students’ reliance interests when it barred international students from attending universities that only offer online courses during the ongoing health crisis.” In the same light, Harvard and MIT asked the following:

  1. A temporary restraining order and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief preventing Defendants from enforcing the policy announced in ICE’s July 6 Directive, or promulgating it as a Final Rule;
  2. An order vacating and setting aside the policy announced in the July 6 Directive and reinstating the March 13 Guidance;
  3. A declaration that the policy announced in the July 6 Directive is unlawful; 
  4. An order awarding Plaintiffs their costs and attorney’s fees; and
  5. Any and all other such relief as the Court may deem appropriate. 
Havard-MIT Complaint for Declaratory and Injuctive Relief

Quotes about the ICE’s SEVP updates

The announcement disrupts our international students’ lives and jeopardizes their academic and research pursuits. ICE is unable to offer the most basic answers about how its policy will be interpreted or implemented. And the guidance comes after many US colleges and universities either released or are readying their final decisions for the fall – decisions designed to advance their educational mission and protect the health and safety of their communities.
Our international students now have many questions – about their visas, their health, their families and their ability to continue working toward an MIT degree. Unspoken, but unmistakable, is one more question: Am I welcome?
At MIT, the answer, unequivocally, is yes.

MIT President L. Rafael Reif from MIT action in response to new ICE rule on online learning

“It is illegal, unnecessary and callous,” “UC will fight this blatant disregard for the law and public health with all the legal means at our disposal.”

University of California President Janet Napolitano in UC poised to sue federal government over new visa policy for international students

“Immediately after the Fourth of July weekend, ICE threw Harvard and MIT— indeed, virtually all of higher education in the United States—into chaos,” (ICE’s action) “leaves hundreds of thousands of international students with no educational options within the United States

The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Boston from Harvard, MIT and Northeastern Sue Feds Over Rules Barring International Students

Instagram examples that shows universities’ commitment to take legal action

View this post on Instagram

Brown is joining with a number of peer colleges and universities in opposing a new federal policy that will prohibit international students from returning to or remaining in the United States if their colleges adopt online-only instruction for Fall 2020 or if students choose online-only instruction. The University will file an amicus brief in support of the legal action taken by @Harvard and @mitpics to seek a temporary restraining order to block the implementation of the new federal guidance on the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Calling the policy “nothing short of cruel” in a message to the campus community, President Christina H. Paxson said it came “at a time when every student, regardless of their country of origin, should benefit from the maximum level of flexibility to pursue their studies in a manner that they or their institutions decide has the highest capacity to support their health and safety.” The brief is expected to be filed with the federal court on Monday, July 13. See link in bio for more information.

A post shared by Brown University (@brownu) on

View this post on Instagram

University of Minnesota President Gabel today: ““Our planned hybrid teaching model this fall supports both in-person and online courses, which should reduce the impact of ICE’s decision on our nearly 6,200 international students systemwide,” Gabel said. “However, we cannot stand by in good conscience as international students are forced out of the country through no fault of their own. Educational institutions across the country are offering expanded online learning opportunities to comply with the public health advice given by another federal agency—the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—to reduce large gatherings, promote physical distancing and take other precautions to minimize the spread and impact of COVID-19. “We stand with our international students, and international students across the country, in asking that the ICE directive be overturned immediately,” Gabel said.” #globalgophers #umnproud

A post shared by ISSS-University of Minnesota (@isssumn) on

View this post on Instagram

Boston University will support two lawsuits and congressional action to fight new federal immigration guidance requiring international students with F-1 visas to leave the US, or transfer to another school, if their university is offering only remote instruction in the fall. BU President Robert A. Brown has directed University officials to join an amicus brief being filed in support of a lawsuit brought by Harvard and MIT against the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy by filing an amicus brief in federal district court to enjoin the rules from going into effect. In addition, he has instructed BU lawyers to provide support and evidence to Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey as she files a lawsuit in US District Court next week to prevent ICE from enacting the new guidelines.   “The new policy is counterproductive, damaging to the progress of international students who fuel the strength of our national research universities, and xenophobic,” says Jean Morrison, BU provost and chief academic officer. “It should be reversed.” Click the link in our bio for more info.

A post shared by Boston University (@bostonu) on

Be Savvies

Related Posts

Would like to participate in the new J program again? Meet the 12 or 24 month bar!
J-1 비자

J 교수 및 연구자가 꼭 알아두어야 할 12개월 또는 24개월 규정(bar)

J-1 비자 만의 특징이 있다면 바로 한번이라도 J-1 비자를 사용해 미국에서 J 프로그램 참여 (교환학생 혹은 방문 교수 등)했다면 새 프로그램 참여 전 12개월 또는 24개월 규정을 따라야 할 수 있다는 것입니다. 하지만 J-1 비자 소지자들이 스스로 이민법을 읽어가며 12개월 혹은 24개월 규정을 따라야 하는지 확인하는 것은 어려울 수 있습니다.

Read More »
What 85% of graduating international students ask me
F-1 비자의 모든 것

유학생 어드바이저가 졸업을 앞둔 미국 유학생들에게 가장 많이 받는 질문들

졸업을 앞둔 유학생들이 가장 많이 하는 질문을 모아봤습니다! 각 질문을 클릭하면 답변으로 이동합니다. 졸업을 앞둔 F-1 학생들이 주로 궁금해하는 점들 1. 졸업 후 OPT 시작일 사이의 기간을 메우기 위해 CPT를 신청할 수 있나요? CPT가 무엇인지 설명하기 전에, 간단하게 답변드리겠습니다. 답변은 “아니오!” 입니다. CPT (Curricular Practical Training)는 현재 재학 중인 유학생을

Read More »