risk and opt

OPT application fee increase? Threats of OPT to the US

If you have checked out our recent blog post, I haven’t received my EAD; OPT EAD processing time, you might be familiar with the Ombudsman Office. The Ombudsman Office is an independent office which provides individual case assistance and makes recommendations to USCIS to improve their administration of immigration benefits. To serve its mission, the Ombudsman issues the yearly reports and this year’s report was published recently in June 30th, 2020. Amongst multiple articles in Annual Report 2020, Foreign Students and the Risks Surrounding Optional Practical Training caught my attention as it illustrates trends of OPT along with its potential risks and threats to the security and prosperity of the United States. I have written several blog posts regarding Trump Administration’s recommendations to limit certain employment programs for nonimmigrant visa holders which made international students and scholars worried and frustrated. So why OPT (Optional Practical Training) is considered threats to some people? This 24 pages long article explores how unguided OPT can be detrimental to the US by illustrating anecdotal evidences and looking at the numbers. This risk analysis and the proposed increase of OPT application fee is summarized especially to deepen the understanding of international students and scholars. Students who would like to see all the details can click here for the full article: Annual Report 2020.

Related blog posts: Trump H1B Visa suspension 6/24~12/31 2020

Contents


The rapid growth of OPT program

As you can see below, the number of OPT and STEM OPT applicants increased rapidly throughout the decades. There were only 2 STEM OPT participants in 2007 and the number grew into 69,650 after ten years. Given the fact that the number of enrolled international students in the U.S. decreased for three consecutive years, the emergence of OPT is noteworthy. Additionally, when you have a closer look into these numbers, more than 33% of OPT participants are from China only, followed by India 18% and South Korea 4.8%. General concerns stem in part from this rapid growth of OPT. According to the Ombudsman, “Federal officials in the Departments of Defense, State, Justice and Homeland Security, along with a variety of Congressional committees and subcommittees, have expressed concern at the emergence of OPT as a means for foreign countries to conduct data collection of sensitive technologies through students and researchers.” Here they use the term “non-traditional collectors (NTCs),” who don’t necessarily gather intellectual property and technologies in a traditional way but may serve as espionages for foreign nationals with their access to U.S. research and technology. This report is particularly focusing on the activities of Chinese governments like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

Moreover, additional concerns come from the number of F-1 students who overstay in the United States. For instance, “in Fiscal Year 2018, 3.73 percent stayed beyond the authorized window for departure at the end of their program. The countries with the largest numbers of overstayers was China, with 12,924 students, India, with 5,716, and Saudi Arabia, with 3,917.”

Foreign Students and the Risks Surrounding Optional Practical Training, Growth in OPT, SETM OPT and CPT

Threats surrounding the OPT program

To investigate the risks and threats around the OPT program, the Ombudsman used the risk framework. To put it simply, the Ombudsman insists that there are in and out risk factors associated with OPT program. On the one hand, there are “in” risk factors which can be categorized as risk factors that are caused within the United States, on the other hand, “out” risk factors can be defined as foreign national’s (again, the report focuses on the Chinese government) intention to take advantage of the program by having non traditional collector (NTC)s. In and out factors that the Ombudsman office has observed are summarized below:

In risk factors

  • Lean staffing at USCIS and SEVP
  • Lack of training for DSO (Designated School Officials, commonly international student advisor) especially “about their role to prevent and report fraud.”
  • Lack of vetting and verification of DSOs
  • No existing mechanism for continuous vetting of foreign national students which makes the OPT vulnerable to existing and prospective threats

OPT has not been designed, staffed or administered to systemically counter such threats, is vulnerable to exploitation by foreign governments with interests adverse to those of the United States.

When a student seeks to apply for OPT program, she/he needs to complete the form I-765 which is an application for Employment Authorization Document. This application is adjudicated by USCIS which is a fee-funded agency. To juggle many responsibilities that USCIS staffs have, USCIS has determined to spend around 12 minutes per adjudication of this benefit. Moreover, It is also reported that the application fee that USCIS charge OPT applicants is not the right size compare to the costs of its operations and USCIS is currently seeking a OPT application fee increase. If the proposal by USCIS is approved, OPT applicants in the future will be charged $165 more.

The proposed increase for the EAD is 20 percent, or an additional $80, for a total of $575, which includes $85 to capture biometrics.

Out risk factors

Move on to the out risk factors, U.S. government is concerned about the risk posed by Chinese three big projects which Chinese government explicitly expressed their intentions to “to achieve economic, technical and military dominance by acquiring intellectual property and cutting-edge innovations.” 

  • Thousand talents plan (TTP): The TTP, which was initiated by Chinese government in 2008, “encourages participants to transfer research and other proprietary information from the United States to China.”
  • Made in China 2025: Few years later from the TTP plan, Chinese government published another plan in 2015 titled ‘Made in China 2025’ which propose the transformation of “China into a leading manufacturing power by the year 2049.”
  • Military-Civil Fusion and Dual-Use technologies: Amongst 10 sectors that are included in the Made in China 2025 plan (visualization of 10 sectors are attached below), most of military-civil fusion technologies are majors that are listed in the 24 month STEM extension list. On this topic, President Trump already announced the proclamation on limiting Chinese graduate students who intend to study “military-civil fusion technology.”

Related blog posts: Chinese students and researchers visa ban by Trump

Liu Ruopeng, a Duke Ph.D. student, who allegedly appropriated sensitive research funded by the U.S. military on metamaterials, and then returned to China to fund a highly successful research institute … which supports the Chinese military in advanced technological developments. …There is speculation that Ruopeng, “who came to the U.S. with the express intent of studying” metamaterials in the Duke lab, “was actually on a mission from the Chinese government.”

Foreign Students and the Risks Surrounding Optional Practical Training

Suggestions to mitigate risks

To prevent potential in and out risks and threats regarding the OPT, the Ombudsman suggested the following:

  1. Certification and recertification of DSOs 
  2. SEVIS system supports for DSOs
  3. Requires an employer be identified in advance; or
  4. Cancel EADs of students who fail to report in to an employer within a reasonable time after EAD issuance with a legitimate employer
  5. Expand the mandatory use of E-verify to encompass all OPT employers 
  6. Requires the existence of the training program

When you look at number 4 to 6, basically the Ombudsman made recommendations to apply STEM OPT requirements to non STEM OPT (initial OPT) to prevent work authorization program being misused. If number 4 takes place, it is highly likely that students would have 90 days or less to find e-verified (legitimate) company since F-1 students cannot accrue more than 90 days of unemployment days during their first year of OPT under the current regulations. In summary, EAD issuance fee (OPT application fee) is anticipated to increase and more strict initial OPT rules can be implemented to prevent overstays of F-1 students as well as data collection of sensitive technologies by International students and researchers.

Be Savvies

Related Posts

J-1 exchange students? Apply for Academic Training for internships
J-1 签证

作为 J-1 交换生赴美实习?学术培训了解一下

交换生是指短期来美国学习和体验不同文化的学生。与获得学位(例如学士学位、硕士学位或博士学位)的攻读学位的学生不同,交换生不会从美国院校获得学位,而是从其本国大学获得学位。在签证方面,攻读学位的学生通常获得F-1学生签证,而非攻读学位(交换)的学生则获得J-1学生签证。但交换生有可能获得 F-1 签证。我为什么要谈论签证?这是因为 F-1 和 J-1 签证持有者都必须知道,根据移民法规,未经授权,他们不得在校外工作。因此,为了在校外公司实习,您应该根据您的签证类型申请不同的就业授权计划。例如,F-1学生应申请并获得批准用于在校期间实习的CPT和毕业后在校外工作的Post-completion OPT。对于 J-1 学生,有一个名为学术培训的项目,通过学术培训项目,交换生可以在校外工作。然而,学术培训规则不如 F-1 学生项目明确,因此大多数 J-1 交换生不会利用该项目。因此,如果您想充分利用在美国的留学经历,请仔细阅读本文,看看您是否符合资格。通过阅读本文,您将能够了解以下内容: (1) Purpose. The primary purpose of academic training is to permit a student, other than a student intern described in paragraph (i) of this section, to participate in an academic training program during his or her studies, without

Read More »
Academic disqualification
F-1 签证

取消学术资格、停学、留校察看和签证

大多数美国学院和大学都有适用于包括国际学生在内的所有学生的学术要求。例如,如果学生 GPA 成绩低于 2.0(满分 4.0),则根据下一学期的机构政策,他或她可能会被留校察看 (AP)。 AP 学生会被分配 AP 顾问,帮助他们提高 GPA。 如果学生的 GPA 没有提高或者学生没有成功完成 AP 流程,学生可能会被取消学业资格或收到学业停课通知。除非学生是故意不学习,否则没有学生愿意收到取消学业资格、停学、留校察看的通知,因为这意味着低 GPA 和没有奖学金等。 然而,对于国际学生来说,处于学术留校察看或被取消学术资格尤其是一件大事,因为他们的非移民身份(学生签证)可能会受到影响。由于国际学生留在美国的目的是学习,因此当他们因学术取消资格/停学和留校察看而无法注册课程时,他们可能不得不离开美国。 因此,这篇文章将探讨学术取消资格、停学和留校察看对国际学生签证状态的影响。经常被问到的问题,例如“美国领事官员会知道我被取消资格吗?”、“我应该怎么做才能取消留学查看的处分?” “我需要离开美国吗?”或“我怎样才能留在美国?”也将被讨论。 目录 留校察看 正如我上面简要提到的,通常会对学生进行学术留校察看,以避免学生离被取消学术资格而被停学更近了。从这个意义上说,大多数学生将能够在即将到来的入学中继续全日制入学。只要国际学生能够注册下一学期的全日制课程,此时学生签证或 SEVIS 记录(I-20 表)就不会受到影响。 话虽这么说,AP 学生应该尽力在下学期摆脱 AP 身份,以免被学校停学或失去身份。同样,处于 AP 状态的学生可能需要更多时间来满足毕业要求,这可能导致无法在 I-20 表格上注明的课程结束日期按时毕业。 在这种情况下,学生没有资格申请延期,因此他们必须返回自己的祖国完成课程。要了解有关“身份失效”的结果的更多信息,请单击以下相关文章: 相关文章:国际学生注意不要“身份失效” 如果你的学校阻止 AP 学生注册全日制课程,你应该与你所在大学的 DSO 沟通,看看你应该做什么,因为从技术上讲,除非你有资格获得减少课程量,否则你将失去身份。 我们鼓励想了解一些学习和写作技巧的国际学生查看以下文章: 相关文章1:全A学习指南:国际学生赴美留学相关文章2:抄袭?所有国际学生都应该知道的写作服务 停学/取消学术资格 现在让我们看一下与学业暂停或取消资格相关的移民法规。 一些院校为学术不合格并因此收到停课通知的学生提供上诉的机会。因此,如果您在学术上被取消资格,在做出最终决定之前,请务必检查您的学院或大学是否允许不合格的学生提出上诉。 如果您的学院或大学不为不合格的学生提供上诉机会,或者您的上诉被拒绝,那么您的签证身份就失效了,因为您不再是 I-20 签发的学院/大学的学生。

Read More »
F-1 to O-1 visa pathway after OPT/STEM OPT
F-1 비자의 모든 것

F-1 유학생 비자에서 OPT/STEM OPT, O-1 비자 까지 잘 이어지려면?

O-1 비자는 다음 분야에서 “뛰어난 능력 extraordinary ability“을 보유한 (미국 입장)외국인이 미국에 체류하며 최대 3년까지 근무할 수 있도록 허용하며, 연장 횟수에 제한 없이 1년 단위로 연장이 가능합니다. 이 뿐 아니라, O-1B 비자는 예술가도 미국에 체류하며 근무할 수 있도록 허가해 주는 비자로, 예술 분야의 예시는 다음과 같습니다: 개인이 “뛰어난 능력 extraordinary

Read More »